Re: Re: multiple hot standby streaming replication scenario with "rotating" the primary server

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Gerhard Hintermayer" <gerhard(dot)hintermayer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: multiple hot standby streaming replication scenario with "rotating" the primary server
Date: 2011-04-11 17:25:00
Message-ID: 4DA2F31C020000250003C665@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Gerhard Hintermayer <gerhard(dot)hintermayer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Because tests & docs say so:
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/continuous-archiving.html#CONTINUOUS-ARCHIVING-CAVEATS

I asked because I didn't remember any mention of hashed indexes. I
still don't know for sure that you have any, much less that you have
so many that it makes sense to reindex the entire database.

Or are you saying you've seen a problem with indexes of other types?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Hintermayer 2011-04-11 17:44:59 Re: Re: multiple hot standby streaming replication scenario with "rotating" the primary server
Previous Message Gerhard Hintermayer 2011-04-11 17:02:09 Re: Re: multiple hot standby streaming replication scenario with "rotating" the primary server