From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2011-01 as of 2011-02-04 |
Date: | 2011-02-15 17:14:43 |
Message-ID: | 4D5AB483.1090602@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/15/2011 06:55 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
> <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:27, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> However, file_fdw is in pretty serious trouble because (1) the copy
>>> API patch that it depends on still isn't committed and (2) it's going
>>> to be utterly broken if we don't do something about the
>>> client_encoding vs. file_encoding problem; there was a patch to do
>>> that in this CF, but we gave up on it.
>> Will we include the copy API patch in 9.1 even if we won't have file_fdw?
>> Personally, I want to include the APIs because someone can develop file_fdw
>> as a third party extension for 9.1 using the infrastructure. The extension
>> will lack of file encoding support, but still useful for many cases.
> I've been kind of wondering why you haven't already committed it. If
> you're confident that the code is in good shape, I don't particularly
> see any benefit to holding off.
>
+10. The sooner the better.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-15 17:15:44 | Re: XMin Hot Standby Feedback patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-15 17:08:53 | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |