| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
| Date: | 2010-11-16 22:12:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4CE301BA.4030801@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/16/10 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2010-11-16 at 14:00 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> It seems to me
>> that most people using unlogged tables won't want to back them up ...
>> especially since the share lock for pgdump will add overhead for the
>> kinds of high-volume updates people want to do with unlogged tables.
>
> Or perhaps most people will want them backed up, because them being
> unlogged the backup is the only way to get them back in case of a crash?
Yeah, hard to tell, really. Which default is less likely to become a
foot-gun?
Maybe it's time for a survey on -general.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-11-16 22:15:47 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-16 22:08:00 | Re: unlogged tables |