Re: unlogged tables

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-11-16 22:08:00
Message-ID: 1289945280.31200.67.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-11-16 at 14:00 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> It seems to me
> that most people using unlogged tables won't want to back them up ...
> especially since the share lock for pgdump will add overhead for the
> kinds of high-volume updates people want to do with unlogged tables.

Or perhaps most people will want them backed up, because them being
unlogged the backup is the only way to get them back in case of a crash?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-11-16 22:12:10 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-11-16 22:07:35 Re: unlogged tables