| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
| Date: | 2010-10-04 19:45:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4CAA2ED6.6030000@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a
>>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C
>>> || D).
>> Good point.
If this is the only feature which standby registration is needed for,
has anyone written the code for it yet? Is anyone planning to?
If not, it seems like standby registration is not *required* for 9.1. I
still tend to think it would be nice to have from a DBA perspective, but
we should separate required from "nice to have".
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-10-04 19:57:29 | Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-10-04 19:35:44 | Re: [PERFORM] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |