Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Kasia Tuszynska" <ktuszynska(at)esri(dot)com>, "Szymon Guz" <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?
Date: 2010-08-10 19:40:37
Message-ID: 4C6164E50200002500034463@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> No, there is no PUBLIC default role in ANY rdbms. In PostgreSQL
> there is PUBLIC schema, not role. In my PostgreSQL database there
> wasn't any such role... but I'll check that now... ok, I've
> checked, I've got 15 roles, none is names PUBLIC, what's more, I
> don't have any roles that cannot login.
>
> run simple query: SELECT rolname FROM pg_roles; and check the
> existence of the PUBLIC role.

Yeah, it's automatically there in a shadowy sort of way. Try this,
for example, in your cluster with no PUBLIC role:

test=# revoke create on database test from public;
REVOKE
test=# grant select on pg_class to public;
GRANT

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Szymon Guz 2010-08-10 19:49:38 Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?
Previous Message charlie derr 2010-08-10 19:37:27 Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected?