Re: pg_upgrade and extra_float_digits

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and extra_float_digits
Date: 2010-05-17 00:59:55
Message-ID: 4BF0950B.5090002@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>>> Eventually the idea would be to have the build farm run such tests (with
>>>> a properly created dump file) so we can learn quickly if the backend
>>>> data format is changed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If we're thinking of doing that, it would be better to back-patch the
>>> change that allowed '3'.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>> It's going to require some fancy dancing to get the buildfarm to do it.
>> Each buildfarm run is for a specific branch, and all the built artefacts
>> are normally thrown away. I'd have to work out a way of stashing the
>> binaries from a build on one branch for use in the pg_upgrade tests in
>> the run on another branch. It's doable but could get messy.
>>
>
> Uh, that is not actually a problem. You just need to set
> extra_float_digits=-3 to create the dump file, which is only done once
> for each major version. You can _load_ that dump file into an
> unmodified old cluster and test just fine. I will write up some
> instructions in the next few days.
>
>

You are missing the point I was making. A buildfarm run does not
normally have available to it any binaries for a version other that the
one it is building. There is no notion of a multi-branch buildfarm run.
Each run is for a particular branch and is a separate miracle. So I'm
not concerned about the structure of the dump file but about what will
be used to load it into an old cluster during a buildfarm run.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2010-05-17 01:07:02 Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-17 00:18:45 Re: pg_upgrade and extra_float_digits