Re: More message encoding woes

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More message encoding woes
Date: 2009-03-30 17:47:58
Message-ID: 49D105CE.5010705@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Where does it get the default codeset from? Maybe we could constrain
>>> that to match the database encoding, the way we do for LC_COLLATE/CTYPE?
>
>> LC_CTYPE. In 8.3 and up where we constrain that to match the database
>> encoding, we only have a problem with the C locale.
>
> ... and even if we wanted to fiddle with it, that just moves the problem
> over to finding an LC_CTYPE value that matches the database encoding
> :-(.
>
> Yup, it's a mess. We'd have done this long ago if it were easy.
>
> Could we get away with just unconditionally calling
> bind_textdomain_codeset with *our* canonical spelling of the encoding
> name? If it works, great, and if it doesn't, you get English.

Yeah, that's better than nothing.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-30 17:52:29 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-30 17:46:14 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf