Re: More message encoding woes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More message encoding woes
Date: 2009-03-30 17:44:44
Message-ID: 20389.1238435084@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Where does it get the default codeset from? Maybe we could constrain
>> that to match the database encoding, the way we do for LC_COLLATE/CTYPE?

> LC_CTYPE. In 8.3 and up where we constrain that to match the database
> encoding, we only have a problem with the C locale.

... and even if we wanted to fiddle with it, that just moves the problem
over to finding an LC_CTYPE value that matches the database encoding
:-(.

Yup, it's a mess. We'd have done this long ago if it were easy.

Could we get away with just unconditionally calling
bind_textdomain_codeset with *our* canonical spelling of the encoding
name? If it works, great, and if it doesn't, you get English.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-30 17:46:14 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-03-30 17:44:13 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf