Re: pg_restore --multi-thread

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore --multi-thread
Date: 2009-02-16 22:47:04
Message-ID: 4999ECE8.6040801@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Cédric Villemain wrote:
>
> -j [jobs], --jobs[=jobs]
> Specifies the number of jobs (pg_restore) to run simultaneously. If the -j
> option is given without an argument, pg_restore will not limit the number of
> jobs that can run simultaneously.
>
>

Quite apart from anything else, this description is almost 100% dead
wrong. The argument is not optional at all, and there is no unlimited
parallelism. If you want to know how it actually works look at the dev docs.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2009-02-17 00:36:19 Re: fillfactor for toast tables is useless?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-02-16 22:09:00 differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?