Re: pg_restore --multi-thread

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Cédric Villemain a écrit :
> Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
>> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:47 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The implementation is actually different across platforms: on Windows
>>>>>> the workers are genuine threads, while elsewhere they are forked
>>>>>> children in the same fashion as the backend (non-EXEC_BACKEND case). In
>>>>>> either case, the program will use up to NUM concurrent connections to
>>>>>> the server.
>>>>>>
>>>>> How about calling it --num-connections or something like that? I agree
>>>>> with Peter that "thread" is not the best terminology on platforms where
>>>>> there is no threading involved.
>>>>>
>>>> --num-workers or --num-connections would both work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> *shrug* whatever. What should the short option be (if any?). -n is
>>> taken, so -N ?
>> Works for me.
>
> is -j already affected ?

else (like make):

-j [jobs], --jobs[=jobs]
Specifies the number of jobs (pg_restore) to run simultaneously. If the -j
option is given without an argument, pg_restore will not limit the number of
jobs that can run simultaneously.

>
>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> andrew
>>>
>
>

- --
Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmZSYkACgkQo/dppWjpEvwO8wCfUFztxS7cmRX+hhbVphfqqDzo
ZzUAniFwmwhI9y6f9Mndg9CPGlQiOaae
=fDYZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----