| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
| Date: | 2009-01-22 16:54:37 |
| Message-ID: | 4978A4CD.5090509@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
>> I can try. Where should this be documented? ISTM that the best place
>> is at the top of "30.1 Database Connection Control Functions", since the
>> issue pertains to any connect/disconnect function. Does that sound
>> correct? Should it be a warning or just regular text?
>
> Minor platform-specific performance nits are not that important. Think
> "footnote", not "warning at the top of the page".
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Its a footnote at the end of the first paragraph in 30.1.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| wsa.patch | text/plain | 2.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2009-01-22 17:15:14 | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-22 16:51:34 | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |