| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
| Date: | 2009-01-22 15:20:33 |
| Message-ID: | 29194.1232637633@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
> I can try. Where should this be documented? ISTM that the best place
> is at the top of "30.1 Database Connection Control Functions", since the
> issue pertains to any connect/disconnect function. Does that sound
> correct? Should it be a warning or just regular text?
Minor platform-specific performance nits are not that important. Think
"footnote", not "warning at the top of the page".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-22 15:31:06 | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-22 15:08:40 | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |