From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Date: | 2008-12-09 13:14:39 |
Message-ID: | 493E6F3F.4010706@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
> if I may request one simple change/addition, Probably trivial to add,
> but I don't have too much time to give away now to any other project
> than one that pays my debts.
> The default param that's in the middle. Would it be hard, or do anyone
> objects against adding 'default' keyword there, so one doesn't have to
> substitute default param 3, when he only wants to override 2nd in
> funct(1,2,3) ?
I don't really understand what you are talking about, but if you mean
allowing default values in the middle of a parameter list, then I'd say
rather not.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2008-12-09 13:16:19 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-12-09 13:13:32 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |