Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1081)

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1081)
Date: 2008-10-09 01:01:12
Message-ID: 48ED57D8.9080504@ak.jp.nec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 17:25 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>
>> What should I do during the remaining 25 days?
>
> I haven't been following this much, but I note that there is lots of
> confusion over the international standards, guidelines, recommendations,
> specifications etc that we should be following. AFAICS the requirements
> have not been solidified and so there is little scope for examining the
> patch to see if it meets any particular definition of usable.
>
> It would be very useful to write a long Wiki article explaining what
> standards you think the security community want and how those have been
> implemented in your patches. And also ones they don't want and why.
> Maybe you have all that already, so its just a case of exposing it.

I also think what you pointed out is right.

We have the following document, but its description is a bit legacy
as I noted to Peter in the previous message.

http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepgsql_security_guide.20080214.en.pdf

If they think the wiki article is useful, I can put the revised documentation
and specification as several wiki pages. I'll do it next to the implementation
of row-level permission, because I *have to* submit it due to the deadline.

Here is a request. I hope to collaborate with native English users, because
it is not my native language. :)

Thanks,

> If it is clearly written and easily publicly accessible (no patches
> etc), then we can easily forward these links to people in the right
> communities and they can provide feedback. I will forward to my UK Gov
> contacts if you post a link (and to me, cos I'm not reading these
> threads). Do it soon, please.
>
> Once that's done, it can then be used as an info source for interested
> people once the patch has been accepted, so it will be valuable over
> time.
>
> There's a clear need for Postgres in government and hi-security
> businesses, so we need to get this right. But there's not much point
> doing 65% or 135% of what's needed.
>
> Your efforts and attention are appreciated by all.

--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-10-09 02:41:19 Re: autovacuum and reloptions
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-10-09 01:00:21 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches