Re: Simpler dump?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
Cc: Ted Byers <r(dot)ted(dot)byers(at)rogers(dot)com>, "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simpler dump?
Date: 2007-12-10 14:13:15
Message-ID: 475D497B.40809@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Ted Byers wrote:
>> Thanks Uwe
>>
>> This is a great start. It reduces the dump from 2 MB
>> down to 167K, but out of 6833 lines of SQL, 5744
>> relate to the public schema in the DB, and I didn't
>> touch that. It has over a dozen types, 419 functions,
>> &c., that were put there by postgresql the moment I
>> created the database.

> Well thats usually not the case unless you changed
> the default database per accident.

The database is called "template1" See the manuals regarding "CREATE
DATABASE" for details.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2007-12-10 14:23:01 Re: Problems with acessing xml functions on other database
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-12-10 14:06:26 Re: [GENERAL] full_page_writes = off?