| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Date: | 2007-10-23 22:15:58 |
| Message-ID: | 471E729E.5030509@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> I'm fairly resistant to putting less-than-ready code in the tree, I must
>> say.
>>
>
> Me too, at least if "less than ready" means "unstable". The committed
> code has to always be solid enough to let everybody continue working on
> their own bits. However, in the past we've tended to refuse stuff if
> it "didn't do anything interesting", and I think that attitude will need
> adjustment. We'll have to be prepared to accept patches that are only
> interesting as waystations to some long-term goal.
>
>
>
Yes, this is a sensible adjustment, even across releases, IMNSHO.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-23 22:17:51 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-23 22:09:39 | Re: dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used |