Re: dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used

This has been saved for the 8.4 release:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, R, 2007-10-19 kell 15:42, kirjutas Joe Conway:
> > Decibel! wrote:
> > > On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Seriously though, I can change it for 8.3, but is it really worth
> > >> back-patching?
> > >
> > > I think it'd be worth changing for 8.3. While C forces you to worry
> > > about memory, SQL does not, so I bet this is a surprise to most folks.
> >
> > I don't think anyone has ever noticed -- certainly not enough to
> > complain in the past 5 years. This behavior has been the same since day
> > one. I don't mind changing it, but I don't see it as a big deal.
>
> Most likely nobody ever uses un-named connection beyond initial testing.
>
> --------------
> Hannu
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +