From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Install on 32 or 64 bit Linux? |
Date: | 2007-08-28 23:01:59 |
Message-ID: | 46D4A967.3030405@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/07 16:21, Ralph Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're at a crossroads here and it's time to upgrade boxes and versions
> of PG.
> This eMail query is about the first step.
>
> Are there any recommendations on whether to install onto 32 vs 64 bit
> Linux?
> We're going to be using virtual machines.
Which hypervisor?
> Our application consists mostly of near-sequential inserts into a LARGE
> table, accompanied by updates into much smaller tables.
> I perform the occasional queries on the large table, requiring
> sequential scans.
>
> Are there any indications whether 32 or 64 bit Linux would be preferable?
You haven't told us the important stuff yet. Primarily:
How *big* is the database?
How many inserts/minute?
What else will this box be doing besides inserting records?
How fast are the disks?
SCSI or SATA/IDE?
How much RAM?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG1KlnS9HxQb37XmcRAkSJAKDIHfK7YzumbMrZ6iPKMUyDnTnafQCbBKDJ
XplucXPbBqXtruC4rlHc+yM=
=Shq4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2007-08-28 23:08:37 | Re: Is there a better way to do this? |
Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2007-08-28 22:46:25 | Re: Is there a better way to do this? |