Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Date: 2007-05-14 10:01:12
Message-ID: 46483368.1050509@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> So I now state fairly confidently that baiji is failing to overwrite
> *any* of the installation tree, /share and /bin both, and instead is
> testing an installation dating from sometime between May 1 and May 11.

Close. There was an Msys build from the 9th running on port 5432.

So, it seems there are a couple of issues here:

1) There appears to be no way to specify the default port number in the
MSVC build. The buildfarm passes it to configure for regular builds,
which obviously isn't run in VC++ mode, thus leaving the build on 5432.

2) VC++ and Msys builds will both happily start on the same port at the
same time. The first one to start listens on 5432 until it shuts down,
at which point the second server takes over seamlessly! It doesn't
matter which is started first - it's as if Windows is queuing up the
listens on the port.

Confusingly, the similar behaviour is reproducible on XP Pro, except the
connection seems to go to the last server started, instead of the first!

Regards, Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2007-05-14 10:08:43 Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-05-14 09:27:58 Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view