| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Date: | 2007-05-08 00:12:53 |
| Message-ID: | 463FC085.1010301@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>> Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
>>> Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
>>> Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I am having difficulty in understanding what the problem is. My
>> understanding is that using BSD licensed code is ok in an LGPL
>> project, but (probably) not vice versa.
>
> To my knowledge you can do it either way, as long as you remember that
> any changes to the lgpl code have to be released.
Could you tell me a recommendation ?
I feel completely LGPL one is simpler.
Thanks.
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-08 00:25:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-08 00:06:34 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-08 00:25:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-08 00:06:34 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |