| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Date: | 2007-05-07 19:52:44 |
| Message-ID: | 463F838C.4040904@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>> Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
>> Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
>> Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
>>
>>
>
> I am having difficulty in understanding what the problem is. My
> understanding is that using BSD licensed code is ok in an LGPL project,
> but (probably) not vice versa.
To my knowledge you can do it either way, as long as you remember that
any changes to the lgpl code have to be released.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-07 20:41:24 | pgsql: Make sure we don't skip databases that are supposed to be |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-07 19:46:42 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kurt Harriman | 2007-05-07 20:53:12 | BufFileWrite across MAX_PHYSICAL_FILESIZE boundary |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-07 19:46:42 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |