| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: perfromance world records |
| Date: | 2007-02-24 17:17:45 |
| Message-ID: | 45E07339.8060506@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/07 11:00, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tomi N/A" <hefest(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
>> clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
>> from an advocacy standpoint: why doesn't postgresql hold a world
>> record of some sort (except performance/price)?
>
> Certified TPC tests are *expensive* to run. If you search the PG
> archives for "TPC" you will probably find some relevant prior
> discussions.
What about non-certified tests?
Or has the TPC copyrighted/licensed/whatever the tests, so that you
can only publish certified results?
> FWIW, Josh has given the impression that Sun is working on producing
> certified TPC-E results with PG.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF4HM5S9HxQb37XmcRArtIAJ0avsmTuu5QxLW3KrGEpdm2zcB5UACgoDzN
X+yxEw0miUXDjMkKeMkRt5E=
=6OBF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jorge Godoy | 2007-02-24 17:22:56 | Re: Composite Keys |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-24 17:00:03 | Re: perfromance world records |