Re: perfromance world records

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Tomi N/A" <hefest(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: perfromance world records
Date: 2007-02-24 17:00:03
Message-ID: 25377.1172336403@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Tomi N/A" <hefest(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
> clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
> from an advocacy standpoint: why doesn't postgresql hold a world
> record of some sort (except performance/price)?

Certified TPC tests are *expensive* to run. If you search the PG
archives for "TPC" you will probably find some relevant prior
discussions.

FWIW, Josh has given the impression that Sun is working on producing
certified TPC-E results with PG.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2007-02-24 17:17:45 Re: perfromance world records
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-24 16:15:58 Re: perfromance world records