From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-06 21:54:32 |
Message-ID: | 45A01A98.8090402@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> The issue is that the _hold_ patches are for patches that arrived after
>>> feature freeze. The patches that arrived after 8.2 was released don't
>>> go in there because it might cause confusion. I also have to control
>>> how quickly I push out patches from the queue so as not to overwhelm
>>> folks.
>> Perhaps it would cause less confusion to name the queues for the version
>> they will be reviewed/applied for, rather than to toggle between queue 1
>> and 2, the logic of which isn't aways immediately obvious to the causal
>> observer.
>
> I don't actually toggle. Hold is for stuff during feature freeze.
But then you go back to the other one once we're through freeze is what
I mean.
> I am open to new names.
patches-8_3 ? Anything coming in after FF then goes to patches-8_4.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-06 21:56:12 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2007-01-06 21:53:05 | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |