Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-06 21:41:04
Message-ID: 200701062141.l06Lf4U29949@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The issue is that the _hold_ patches are for patches that arrived after
> > feature freeze. The patches that arrived after 8.2 was released don't
> > go in there because it might cause confusion. I also have to control
> > how quickly I push out patches from the queue so as not to overwhelm
> > folks.
>
> Perhaps it would cause less confusion to name the queues for the version
> they will be reviewed/applied for, rather than to toggle between queue 1
> and 2, the logic of which isn't aways immediately obvious to the causal
> observer.

I don't actually toggle. Hold is for stuff during feature freeze. I am
open to new names.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2007-01-06 21:53:05 Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-06 21:40:16 Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances