Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Date: 2002-12-04 07:50:27
Message-ID: 45722044.1038991827@liza
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

--On Mittwoch, 4. Dezember 2002 12:18 +0530 Shridhar Daithankar
<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:

> On 3 Dec 2002 at 22:38, David Garamond wrote:
>> well, i agree with you that postgresql is stable and solid. one of my
>> biggest gripes with postgresql is that it's not "lightweight" or
>> "simple" enough. some things are awkward/a chore to do in postgresql,
>> while simple in other dbms's. in mysql, i can shut down mysqld, copy the
>> database directory to another installation, and be done with it. ms
>
> And why it will not work with postgresql? Shutdown the database, backup
> the data directory and restart with another option.
>
> Just because you can backup database online does not mean you can not do
> a off- line backup.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong..

At least it worked for me :-)

Regards
Tino

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pginfo 2002-12-04 08:30:00 pg and number of parameters by insert
Previous Message Clark C. Evans 2002-12-04 07:18:11 Anyone working on OLAP stuff?