Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jim Buttafuoco <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
Date: 2006-11-20 21:14:34
Message-ID: 45621ABA.8080502@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> I might be one of the ones who depends on the same interpreter. In your new
> scheme, the _SHARED hash will only be shared between like interpreters,
> correct? This is going to force me to switch all of my perl code to use the
> plperlu interpreter :(
>
>

Yes. Sorry, but I can't see any way around it. If anyone can suggest one
then speak up loudly ASAP.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-11-20 21:30:30 Re: Custom Data Type Question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 21:02:08 Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-21 03:45:00 Re: Caveat Caveat
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 20:59:13 Re: Brazilian FAQ update