Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with
Date: 2006-11-20 21:02:08
Message-ID: 200611202102.kAKL28221453@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in
> > core ?
>
> Are there any issues with tsearch2 not in core?

No, but many think the idea of moving well-established code from
/contrib into the backend is true for tsearch2 once it works for
multi-byte encodings.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-11-20 21:14:34 Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 20:59:13 Re: Brazilian FAQ update