| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performace review |
| Date: | 2006-10-22 15:12:30 |
| Message-ID: | 453B8A5E.2070103@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/22/06 06:45, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Tomi NA wrote:
>>>> I was just reading http://www.opencrx.org/faq.htm where RDBMS engines
>>>> are one of the questions and see pgsql bashed sentence after sentence.
>>>> Can anyone offer any insight as to weather it's fact or FUD?
>>> It is 100% FUD.
>>>
>> What would be the incentive for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL?
>> Does anyone know?
>
> That implies malice. The people at OpenCRX apparently really
> believe what they wrote.
I believe they probably do believe it and it was probably driven by a
complete lack of understanding of PostgreSQL.
It doesn't have to be malicious for it to be FUD though.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-22 16:15:55 | Re: How to find out about zlib compression |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-10-22 12:30:56 | Re: performace review |