| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performace review |
| Date: | 2006-10-23 15:22:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1161616931.19772.6.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:12 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 10/22/06 06:45, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Tomi NA wrote:
> >>>> I was just reading http://www.opencrx.org/faq.htm where RDBMS engines
> >>>> are one of the questions and see pgsql bashed sentence after sentence.
> >>>> Can anyone offer any insight as to weather it's fact or FUD?
> >>> It is 100% FUD.
> >>>
> >> What would be the incentive for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL?
> >> Does anyone know?
> >
> > That implies malice. The people at OpenCRX apparently really
> > believe what they wrote.
>
> I believe they probably do believe it and it was probably driven by a
> complete lack of understanding of PostgreSQL.
Actually, after reading the reply from Brandon Aiken, I believe it was
driven by a complete lack of understanding of relational theory.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-10-23 15:25:09 | Re: performace review |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-23 14:52:30 | Re: Fw: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - October 22 2006 == |