Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date: 2006-10-02 07:53:45
Message-ID: 4520C589.3030604@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Robert,

I'm working on the new version of the Solaris FAQ and I mentioned this
in this document. I'm going to sent patch asap.

Zdenek

Robert Treat napsal(a):
> On Monday 24 July 2006 17:00, Robert Lor wrote:
>> Excellent! I'll submit a doc patch shortly.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Robert
>>
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I've committed the dtrace patch. Some documentation would be nice now ...
>
> Looking through -patches I don't see the doc patch, and outside of
> installation.sgml there doesn't seem to be anything either. Robert, are you
> still on the hook for these? Also should installation.sgml mention the
> issueswith building 32 vs 64 bit binaries and/or the issue with static
> functions?
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-02 07:55:31 Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-02 07:47:09 Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-02 12:19:08 Re: [HACKERS] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2006-10-02 03:13:58 ISO week dates