| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions |
| Date: | 2006-10-02 07:47:09 |
| Message-ID: | 29324.1159775229@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, I just got the email from Magnus which says do not use v2.1, but
> 1.875, so I guess that's what I did wrong. Oops!
Certainly not --- we work with both of those (I have 1.875 on one of my
devel machines and 2.1 on two others). In fact, your diff says you have
2.1 on the failing machine and 2.2 on the working one, which got my
attention because I didn't know there was a 2.2.
Right at the moment I'm not seeing what's significant in your diff and
what's just incidental to 2.1-vs-2.2 coding changes and Windows-vs-Linux
\n vs \r\n newline discrepancies. I'm about outta steam for tonight...
anyone else want to look closely?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2006-10-02 07:53:45 | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-10-02 07:35:48 | Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions |