Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-11 15:17:57
Message-ID: 44DC9FA5.1060607@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I do not agree. How you determine what release fixes the bug now? We
> have web page and mailing list for bug reporting but there is not any
> relation between bug, patch and release(s). I think bug tracking is
> necessary if we want move forward.

You can completely forget the idea of having an actual bug tracking
system. It has been beaten to death over the years. The developers have
very specific requirements that no bug tracker currently adheres to.

If you are in the mood for a long, never ending soap opera on the topic
I suggest you review the archives :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Zdenek
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-11 16:01:06 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-11 15:16:19 Re: 8.2 features status