Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used
Date: 2006-07-15 08:41:39
Message-ID: 44B8AA43.8090003@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers


> RenameRewriteRule, and I defer to Teodor about the gist and gin
> functions. The others range somewhere between "no" and "hell no".

I think that gistcentryinit() and extractEntriesS() should not be a
static.

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-15 13:34:57 Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used
Previous Message User Pgstudy 2006-07-15 08:35:49 fulldisjunction - fd: more CTID attribute consolidation.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2006-07-15 11:15:11 Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update
Previous Message Neil Conway 2006-07-15 04:40:54 Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used