Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-18 20:26:39
Message-ID: 446CD87F.9090703@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


>> You've made some sweeping allegations here and no specifics.
>
> sweeping allegations?
>
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/server-sql-mode.html
> SET [GLOBAL|SESSION] sql_mode='ALLOW_INVALID_DATES'

Which can be turned off or on by any mysql user. Not to mention the fact
that it is even an option.

Joshua D. Drake

> follow its development.
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-18 20:31:46 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-18 20:25:34 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-18 20:31:46 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-18 20:25:34 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?