From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-18 20:25:34 |
Message-ID: | 446CD83E.9050901@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> I do agree that its probably not worth allocating core resources to
> this, but spouting outdated FUD is really making you two look foolish.
And which FUD would this be?
>
> You have to understand that MySQL evolves just like PostgreSQL does. So
> you better focus on advertising where PostgreSQL shines instead of
> poking fun at something you apparently do not follow.
Uhmmm, I am not even going to bother responding to this part. It is
obvious that *you* don't follow MySQL versus PostgreSQL.
No offense but the development models and thus evolution thereof are
completely different.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-18 20:26:39 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-05-18 20:25:17 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-18 20:26:39 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-05-18 20:25:17 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |