Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"

From: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: stelar(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Date: 2006-02-16 02:49:49
Message-ID: 43F3E84D.1030703@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> And since MySQL already has got the upperhand in terms of marketing, Oracle
> would buy MySQL to make it as the low-end alternative. Never mind the
> lack/immature features in MySQL such as stored proc or trigger.

Mysql 5 has stored procedures and triggers.

The fact that you have to change between different "storage engines" to
use transactions properly etc is a little weird (and some of the new
engines are just bizarre), but that's beside the point.

90% of open-source software is written to use only mysql (and it's not
easy to switch to another db) - search freshmeat or sourceforge for
anything postgresql related.. not much there.

Then, even if you do write something to use postgresql a lot of hosts
don't support it anyway ('mysql is good enough').. so you're stuck.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Uwe C. Schroeder 2006-02-16 02:56:37 Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Previous Message Leonard Soetedjo 2006-02-16 02:39:08 Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"