Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"

From: "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, stelar(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Date: 2006-02-16 02:56:37
Message-ID: 200602151856.37910.uwe@oss4u.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 15 February 2006 18:49, Chris wrote:
> > And since MySQL already has got the upperhand in terms of marketing,
> > Oracle would buy MySQL to make it as the low-end alternative. Never mind
> > the lack/immature features in MySQL such as stored proc or trigger.
>
> Mysql 5 has stored procedures and triggers.
>
> The fact that you have to change between different "storage engines" to
> use transactions properly etc is a little weird (and some of the new
> engines are just bizarre), but that's beside the point.
>
> 90% of open-source software is written to use only mysql (and it's not
> easy to switch to another db) - search freshmeat or sourceforge for
> anything postgresql related.. not much there.
>
> Then, even if you do write something to use postgresql a lot of hosts
> don't support it anyway ('mysql is good enough').. so you're stuck.

Well, I guess the moment all the hoster's have to buy commercial licenses for
providing a database they'll switch to PG in no time - or charge more for the
people who absolutely need mysql.
Maybe it's time to write a sophisticated "mysql to postgresql" automation
tool....

UC

--
Open Source Solutions 4U, LLC 1618 Kelly St
Phone: +1 707 568 3056 Santa Rosa, CA 95401
Cell: +1 650 302 2405 United States
Fax: +1 707 568 6416

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2006-02-16 03:12:48 Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Previous Message Chris 2006-02-16 02:49:49 Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"