Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Date: 2005-12-13 02:13:28
Message-ID: 439E2E48.8070602@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

>>>Interesting article; author's bias for Oracle got overturned by us:
>>>http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oracle/115560
>>
>>Not hardly. Lewis is a hard-core Oracle geek. But open-minded. He and I
>>have been debating OSS vs. Proprietary databases on ITToolbox.com for some
>>time.
>
>
> Well, ok, maybe his bias wasn't overturned, but we still came out ahead
> despite it.

How come he tested 8.0 and not 8.1? Is it an old article?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-12-13 02:23:03 Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-12-12 21:51:17 Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5