Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Date: 2005-12-12 21:48:53
Message-ID: 20051212214853.GF54639@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:51:17PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > Interesting article; author's bias for Oracle got overturned by us:
> > http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oracle/115560
>
> Not hardly. Lewis is a hard-core Oracle geek. But open-minded. He and I
> have been debating OSS vs. Proprietary databases on ITToolbox.com for some
> time.

Well, ok, maybe his bias wasn't overturned, but we still came out ahead
despite it.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-12-12 21:51:17 Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-12-12 21:24:49 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5