Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
Date: 2005-09-29 07:44:58
Message-ID: 433B9B7A.6070700@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> I'm the one that Chris mentioned that did the performance tuning on RT.
> Best Practical are really good people to work with, but they will only
> use code that will work across all databases the support. There was one
> query in particular that made really horrible use of OR clauses. I sent
> in details on how to rewrite the query using unions, which changed it
> query from a "execute your query and go make coffee" type of query to
> one that completed in a very reasonable period of time. I was told that
> it wasn't an option because MySQL didn't have Unions.

MySQL 4 has unions...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2005-09-29 16:29:32 Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
Previous Message Chris Browne 2005-09-28 03:10:53 XA