Re: another roles related question

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: another roles related question
Date: 2005-07-10 00:22:24
Message-ID: 42D06A40.10407@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
>>Is this something we should worry about? Or do we just put a warning in
>>the docs?
>
> I've already submitted a patch which should correct this. It also adds
> a new SQL function which determines if a given user is in a specific
> role. It also implements SET ROLE, CURRENT_ROLE and SYSTEM_USER.
>
> Hopefully it'll get applied in some form (I havn't had any response to
> it yet at all but I'm guessing people are just busy atm...).

Oh, cool. Sorry for the noise. I'll rummage through the archives and
have a look.

Thanks (again),

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-10 00:29:56 Re: another roles related question
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-10 00:17:18 Re: another roles related question