From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-02 20:53:59 |
Message-ID: | 42769367.1090900@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Ron Mayer wrote:
>
>
> * I'd like to see the status of pgFoundry projects on
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl
>
> Right now I have confidence in most of the contrib
> modules largely because I can quickly see if they
> succeed or fail.
>
> I'd like any pgFoundry project that is released
> into the table described above to also have regression
> tests that must pass before they're included in that table.
> Ideally, I'd like to be able to see those results for
> any released PGFoundry projects run on pgbuildfarm as well
> so the status is easily visible.
>
See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for
buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but
would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's
creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2005-05-02 20:58:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-02 20:40:44 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvar Freude | 2005-05-02 20:56:31 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-02 20:47:23 | Re: pg_locks needs a facelift |