Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-02 20:53:59
Message-ID: 42769367.1090900@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer wrote:

>
>
> * I'd like to see the status of pgFoundry projects on
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl
>
> Right now I have confidence in most of the contrib
> modules largely because I can quickly see if they
> succeed or fail.
>
> I'd like any pgFoundry project that is released
> into the table described above to also have regression
> tests that must pass before they're included in that table.
> Ideally, I'd like to be able to see those results for
> any released PGFoundry projects run on pgbuildfarm as well
> so the status is easily visible.
>

See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for
buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but
would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's
creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rosser Schwarz 2005-05-02 20:58:16 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-02 20:40:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvar Freude 2005-05-02 20:56:31 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 20:47:23 Re: pg_locks needs a facelift