Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

From: Rosser Schwarz <rosser(dot)schwarz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Held <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Date: 2005-05-02 20:58:16
Message-ID: 37d451f7050502135864ef3ed3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

while you weren't looking, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Adjustments?

A couple slight tweaks and rephrasings:

<p>If you're looking for a PostgreSQL gatekeeper, central committe or
controlling company, give up; there isn't one. We do have a core
committe and don't hand out CVS commit privileges like candy, but this
is more for ease of administration than control. The project is driven
by the needs of the community of developers and users, which anyone
can join. All you need to do is subscribe to the mailing list(s) and
participate in the discussions. (See the <a
href="http://www.postgresql.org/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html">Developer's FAQ</a>
for more information on how to get involved in PostgreSQL
development.)</p>

/rls

--
:wq

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rosser Schwarz 2005-05-02 21:01:07 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-02 20:53:59 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 20:59:36 Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.)
Previous Message Alvar Freude 2005-05-02 20:56:31 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1