Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-05 20:21:11
Message-ID: 4252F337.9060502@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> What I would much prefer is a matrix that shows all the features a PL
> should / could have, and which PLs have those features, which features
> are currently being implemented, who maintains them if they are
> maintained, if they aren't maintained, etc.. So that when it comes time
> to choose one, you can make an informed decision ahead of time.
>
>

The Matrix idea is a very good one.

I'd also like to see the same for replication solutions too. We all know
that there is no one replication system to suit all situations: such a
matrix would make it much easier to decide which one actually *does*
suit the situation you have in mind.

--

Russ.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-04-05 20:30:38 Re: cygwin and psql
Previous Message Carlos Roberto Chamorro Mostac 2005-04-05 20:20:59 unsubscribe

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-05 20:32:11 Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-05 20:19:54 Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry