From: | Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Date: | 2005-04-05 20:21:11 |
Message-ID: | 4252F337.9060502@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> What I would much prefer is a matrix that shows all the features a PL
> should / could have, and which PLs have those features, which features
> are currently being implemented, who maintains them if they are
> maintained, if they aren't maintained, etc.. So that when it comes time
> to choose one, you can make an informed decision ahead of time.
>
>
The Matrix idea is a very good one.
I'd also like to see the same for replication solutions too. We all know
that there is no one replication system to suit all situations: such a
matrix would make it much easier to decide which one actually *does*
suit the situation you have in mind.
--
Russ.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-04-05 20:30:38 | Re: cygwin and psql |
Previous Message | Carlos Roberto Chamorro Mostac | 2005-04-05 20:20:59 | unsubscribe |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-04-05 20:32:11 | Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-05 20:19:54 | Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry |