Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry
Date: 2005-04-05 20:32:11
Message-ID: 20050405203211.GA31394@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:19:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've gotten a bee in my bonnet again about Resdom being wasteful.
> There is no case where Resdom appears without TargetEntry, nor vice
> versa, so we ought to fold them into a single node type.

Gee, I was looking at that code and nearby comments three days ago and
wondering if I'd do that.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
Voy a acabar con todos los humanos / con los humanos yo acabaré
voy a acabar con todos / con todos los humanos acabaré (Bender)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Master of the beasts 2005-04-05 20:37:49 Catching DDL events (or equivalent functionality)
Previous Message Russ Brown 2005-04-05 20:21:11 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?