From: | Kaloyan Iliev Iliev <news1(at)faith(dot)digsys(dot)bg> |
---|---|
To: | Miroslav Љulc <miroslav(dot)sulc(at)startnet(dot)cz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to read query plan |
Date: | 2005-03-14 17:03:37 |
Message-ID: | 4235C3E9.2080505@faith.digsys.bg |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Hi,
I have an idea about your problem. Will it be difficult not to change
the entire code but only the queries? You can change type in the
Postgres to bool. Then, when select data you can use a CASE..WHEN to
return 'Y' or 'N' or even write a little function which accepts bool and
returns 'Y' or 'N'. In this case in all your queries you will have to
replace the select of bool field with select form the function.
Kaloyan
Miroslav Љulc wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Just FYI, I did a quick search-and-replace on your dump to replace
>> varchar(1) by "char", which makes the column fixed-width without any
>> change in the visible data. This made hardly any difference in the
>> join speed though :-(. So that is looking like a dead end.
>>
>>
> I'll try to change the data type to bool but the problem I stand in
> front of is that the code expects that SELECTs return 'Y' or 'N' but
> what I have found out till now is that PostgreSQL returns 't' or 'f'
> for bool data. I think about some solution but they use CPU :-(
>
>> John's idea about re-joining to the main table to pick up the bulk of
>> its fields only after joining to the sub-tables might work.
>>
>>
> I'll try that. It seems it could work.
>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
> Miroslav
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miroslav Šulc | 2005-03-14 17:07:54 | Re: How to read query plan |
Previous Message | Michael Adler | 2005-03-14 17:01:43 | Re: invalidating cached plans |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miroslav Šulc | 2005-03-14 17:07:54 | Re: How to read query plan |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2005-03-14 16:47:36 | Bad Performance[2] |