Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around

Tom Lane wrote:
> pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
>
>>In fact, I think it is so bad, that I think we need to back-port a fix to
>>previous versions and issue a notice of some kind.
>
>
> They already do issue notices --- see VACUUM.
>
> A real fix (eg the forcible stop we were talking about earlier) will not
> be reasonable to back-port.

Would at least a automated warning mechanism be a reasonable backport?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
Command Prompt, Inc., your source for PostgreSQL replication,
professional support, programming, managed services, shared
and dedicated hosting. Home of the Open Source Projects plPHP,
plPerlNG, pgManage, and pgPHPtoolkit.
Contact us now at: +1-503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com