Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around
Date: 2005-02-18 17:10:09
Message-ID: 19175.1108746609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
> In fact, I think it is so bad, that I think we need to back-port a fix to
> previous versions and issue a notice of some kind.

They already do issue notices --- see VACUUM.

A real fix (eg the forcible stop we were talking about earlier) will not
be reasonable to back-port.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-02-18 17:45:14 Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-02-18 16:58:32 Re: SPI_finish and RegisterExprContextCallback